|
 First
Known Human Inhabitants: The Ohlone Indians circa 1200 b.c. to
1800 a.d. The first
known Native Americans from the East Bay area arrived approximately 3,000 years ago.
These people, known as the Ohlone Indians, enjoyed the natural abundance
of the area. They hunted and fished in the marshlands, in the bay, and along
the creeks. With no need to roam or move around in search of new sources
of food or to fight neighbors for scarce resources, these were believed
to be a
peaceful people who remained in the same
village locations over many generations living off the bounty of the
land.
Over 400 Indian burial mounds were found around the San Francisco Bay
area.
One,
with the
remains of about 450 people was found in Alameda near Santa Clara Ave and
Mound Street. It also contained "stone implements and
shell ornaments." The natives decorated themselves with shells and
feathers and they used stones, shells, and bones for tools (see pictures
at left and right taken at Alameda Museum). The mound and its contents was "removed" in 1908. A
plaque commemorating the burial mound can be found in Lincoln Park in
Alameda City today
(click on picture at left).
European Discovery of the San
Francisco Bay area in 1772
The San Francisco Bay area lay hidden from non-native
discovery until 1772. The late discovery can likely be attributed to the
small opening from the Pacific Ocean to the San Francisco Bay at the Golden Gate, combined with
the area being often shrouded in fog and the natural camouflage provided
by the East Bay hills seen in the background of the entrance to the bay.
In fact, the Bay Area was first seen by Europeans who were on a land
expedition. The land was quickly claimed as being owned by Spain.
Mission San Jose Established 1797
Just
seven years later, in 1797, the Spanish established Mission San Jose in
the East Bay (The San Jose mission is located at 43300 Mission Blvd in what is Fremont,
CA today). Ohlone Indians lived in the area. The mission raised cattle
and sheep. In 1832 the mission had 12,000 cattle, 13,000 horses and
12,000 sheep which grazed between the area of the mission and Oakland.
The mission was very productive and had the second highest agriculture
output and the highest olive oil production of all of the California
missions. Between 1825 and 1830 there were approximately 2,000
California natives living on the mission grounds. In 1833 the mission
had thousands of acres of crops and grazing land stretching from San
Jose to Oakland to Livermore.
In
1834 control of the missions shifted from the Spanish to the Mexicans
and the Spanish Padres left. Within three years, by 1837, the San Jose Mission's
land was divided into Ranchos and the mission buildings were abandoned.
The natives that had been living there suddenly no longer had the
support of the Mission and its way of life; finding it very difficult to
adjust back to their previous ways, many of them died.
1AA Spanish
Rancho Era circa 1820-1850
In 1820 the King of Spain granted Luis Maria Peralta, a Spanish Army
officer, a 44,800 acre, 35 mile land grant (known as a "rancho"). The
land was given to him in recognition for his
service in the Spanish Army. The land included what are today the cities
of:
El Cerito, Berkeley, Albany, Oakland, Piedmont, and Alameda. In 1842, Luis Peralta divided his land up
among his four surviving sons. Antonio Peralta, his third son, received
what today includes the cities of Alameda and most of Oakland.

The image at the left is from a close-up of a map that was made in 1844
- five years before the gold rush (click on it for a bigger picture).
The San Leandro label on the map is
not identifying a city, but refers to the water (Sand Leandro Bay and San
Leandro Creek, which at this point are not too indistinguishable, they are
more like one body). S. Antonio is where the
entrance to the
estuary between Alameda and Oakland (the inner harbor) is today. Lake Merritt hasn't been "made" yet
. Lake Merritt was made in 1869 from 155 acres of "dammed tidal water" from the headwaters of Indian Slough.
The land was donated by Dr. Samuel Merritt in 1867. Lake Merritt was
first known as "Merritt's Lake" (map info)
Alameda can be clearly seen as
a peninsula in this map of 1844. The map is over 50 years before the "estuary"
and "tidal canal" was completed in 1902, which separated
Alameda from Oakland and made it an Island.
The image to the right is from the same map but shows a
larger area. Notice the "Pins Rouge" (redwood trees) in the Oakland Hills.
Other than maps there are very few visual references
(such as photographs or drawings) during this early period. However, there
are some early visual descriptions of what the environment was like at this
time. In an address during the "Pioneers Picnic at Dry Creek" Judge Crane provided a first hand account of what the land in the
area of Alameda County was like in the 1850s, when the ownership of the land
was still largely controlled by a handful of large Spanish and Mexican land
grants, with some squatters also beginning to gain some control of the land.
During this period Judge Crane observes, "Nearly all of this land was
still in a state of nature, unenclosed, uncultivated, and unoccupied,
except as a range for herds of half a wild cattle." 1A
The Redwoods in the Oakland
Hills (San Antonio Forest) are Cut Down circa 1842-1853
The first major environmental impact on the San Leandro Bay which was caused by human
activity started in 1842, six years before the California Gold rush. This is
the year that Don Peralta divided his land among his four sons and the same
year that full-scale logging of the Oakland hills began. The Redwoods in the
Oakland Hills were in an old growth redwood forest called San Antonio
Forest. Visual accounts from the time indicate that the Oakland Hills may
have had some of the oldest and biggest redwood trees in the world. William
P. Gibbons, who in 1855 was the curator of geology and mineralogy at the
California Academy of Sciences, in 1893 published “The Redwoods in the
Oakland Hills”, a survey that he had made 40 years earlier describing a “sea
of stumps” (in 1855) in the Oakland Hills. He found one redwood tree stump that
measured “over 31 feet across at a height of four feet from the ground." 9
Blossom Rock Trees
Two trees in
the Oakland Hills were so tall that Sea Captains could see them up in the
Oakland Hills after entering the Golden Gate of the San Francisco Bay. Known
as the “Blossom Rock” trees, they provided the Sea Captains with a visual
marker to help them navigate safely away from the “Blossom Rock”, an
underwater rock near Yerba Buena Island.10
After the trees were
cut down in the early 1850s a lighthouse was built on Yerba Buena Island to
help guide the Ship Captains. Although many of the redwood trees in the
forest were likely over 2,000 years old, in just about ten years the entire
San Antonio redwood forest was virtually completely cut down. The trees
were milled at saws in the Oakland Hills and the lumber was sold largely to
people building the first buildings in San Francisco.
After the San
Francisco earthquake and fire in 1906, once again there was a tremendous
demand for wood in San Francisco. And once again, the San Antonio Redwood
Forest was logged to provide lumber to build the city. This time however,
not only the trees, which were now only second growth trees that had been
growing for only about 50 years, were taken, but even the stumps were cut up
and sold. This is especially unfortunate because redwood trees often grow
new trees from their old stumps and their removal made it virtually
impossible for the forest to ever recover. This area today, which includes
two regional parks, is vastly different from the original old growth forest
that existed pre 1840s; although today there are a relatively small amount of
third growth redwood trees there, which are now up to 100 years old.
Undoubtedly,
the elimination of the trees in the Oakland Hills had a very severe impact
on the surrounding ecosystem -- including causing a vast amount of soil
erosion washing soil down the creeks and into the San Leandro Bay. It is
also highly likely that the removal of the trees had a cascading negative
impact on a variety of the living creatures, both plant and animal, that
over millennium had been intertwined and dependent on the trees being there.
|